updates

[Barney_Ross]

If you park Vortex in that packer, it start to float.

[CarlJohnson]

If you park Vortex in that packer, it start to float.

What?

[Barney_Ross]

Vortex + packer = air

[CarlJohnson]

SAMP doesn't support AttachVehicleToVehicle, so we can't actually park / attach Vortex on the top of Packer. It'll fall off somehow.

[Dobby]

SAMP doesn't support AttachVehicleToVehicle, so we can't actually park / attach Vortex on the top of Packer. It'll fall off somehow.

This has been known for a long time, explained by both me and Joshy.

That video also looks like it doesn't use CT's mission scripts (COLOR_GREEN, COLOR_STRONGRED for client messages). Work on it more.

[R3AP3R]

Dobby my friend, no offence, but did you just tell a guy, who's not the server's scripter, to work harder on what's supposed to be your job? PRICELESS 

Green color, red color, at least he actually did something even though it's not even his job. How's your finger btw?

Anyway, nice work Carl and congratz for doing more thing in a few days than our skilled scripters in 3 years.

[Google]

Can you guys please stop with the fight and wait for it ? I also want things , but i have patience. Also i would like to thank Dobby for what he did in the past for this community and hopefully he'll still do a great work in the future. SOME OF YOU BIG MOUTHS DIDN'T DO ANYTHING , if you're that good anyway apply for a spot in the dev team!
I find this lack of respect for old member that did something for this community and should be thankfull to them idiotic , you people allways want more , but not even thanking for what we have. Without them some things wouldn't be implemented to our community! Some of you guys can't even discuss on a topic without picking on each other or the staff.

Sorry for my rage ,but imo this topic should be locked or negative / innapropiate comments should be deleted.

[CarlJohnson]

SAMP doesn't support AttachVehicleToVehicle, so we can't actually park / attach Vortex on the top of Packer. It'll fall off somehow.

This has been known for a long time, explained by both me and Joshy.

That video also looks like it doesn't use CT's mission scripts (COLOR_GREEN, COLOR_STRONGRED for client messages). Work on it more.

I know, that's because it doesn't use CT's mission scripts xD, It's my own gamemode. The script has been improved ever since, like it destroys the objects once the mission is over and reassigns the objects to vehicle which claims it thereafter.
Edit: For some reason i can't destroy the objects, maybe I'm going wrong somewhere...

Dobby my friend, no offence, but did you just tell a guy, who's not the server's scripter, to work harder on what's supposed to be your job? PRICELESS 

Green color, red color, at least he actually did something even though it's not even his job. How's your finger btw?

Anyway, nice work Carl and congratz for doing more thing in a few days than our skilled scripters in 3 years.

Actually no, he told me to work more on my own script so that i can learn more.
xD No, They can do better than me, I'm still learning and new to this while they've been scripting for years now.
Thanks though

[Ethan]

Anyway, nice work Carl and congratz for doing more thing in a few days than our skilled scripters in 3 years.

G Fucking G Carl   ... who really cares if it is or isnt coded to CT standard, hes learning.

[Dobby]

I'm certainly not going to sugarcoat it. If its not to CT's standards i'm certainly going to say so, regardless of what everyone says.

Assign the object an ID when you create it. Array's might be useful for you in this way.

https://wiki.sa-mp.com/wiki/Scripting_Basics#Arrays

[CarlJohnson]

This is how the script is now

Code Select Expand


...
stock CheckpointEntered(playerid)
{
        new gString[128];
        new object1 = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
        new object2 = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
        new object3 = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
if(MissionStatus[playerid] == 1)
{
new vID = GetPlayerVehicleID(playerid);
if(GetVehicleModel(vID) == 443)
        {
            new vehicleid = GetPlayerVehicleID(playerid);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(object1, vehicleid, 0.0, -1.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(object2, vehicleid, 0.0, -3.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(object3, vehicleid, 0.0, -5.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
....

This attaches the created objects to the packer
Then

Code Select Expand


...
If the player is loaded and enters checkpoint

                DestroyObject(object1);
                DestroyObject(object2);
                DestroyObject(object3);
             }
        return 1;
}
Mind telling me how would i declare a array for Create Object ? As I'm unable to do so.
Edit: Something like this ?

Code Select Expand

new objects[3];
.... // other stuff
stock CheckpointEntered(playerid)
{
        new gString[128];
        objects[0] = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
        objects[1] = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
        objects[2] = CreateObject(2964, 0, 0, -10, 0, 0, 0);
if(MissionStatus[playerid] == 1)
{
new vID = GetPlayerVehicleID(playerid);
if(GetVehicleModel(vID) == 443)
        {
            new vehicleid = GetPlayerVehicleID(playerid);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(objects[0], vehicleid, 0.0, -1.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(objects[1], vehicleid, 0.0, -3.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
            AttachObjectToVehicle(objects[2], vehicleid, 0.0, -5.0, 1.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
....
....
                DestroyObject(objects[0]);
                DestroyObject(objects[1]);
                DestroyObject(objects[2]);
               }
            return 1;
}

[Sjomp]

Isn't there something wrong at the .... you posted?
Try it with a message like "objects deleted".
Btw you should add Max_Players to your objects else it would fuck up with multiple players

[CarlJohnson]

Isn't there something wrong at the .... you posted?
Try it with a message like "objects deleted".
Btw you should add Max_Players to your objects else it would fuck up with multiple players

Done 

[Lindsey]

Just focus on Carl rather than the negative one or the people hiding updates being a veil, that's fantastic what he has done right there and now i know what's coming i can look out for it. I realise that's not nearly completed, but it's nice to know things are being worked on all the time and we can see evidence of that here.

Glad he's taking the time to fulfil the role he applied for, keep up the great work dude!

[nickd25]

I dont see a problem if 5 or 6 players pay for it

You didn't get it, the problem is you have to give them the server files, insecure as shit.

Just letting you know that nothing would need to be changed to get on the hosted tab. Whoever is providing the hosted tab just needs to know the servers ip and port. Nothing has to be done with files and it is not insecure.