Kicking inactive mappers

[Doc.]

Do they? cause from what i'm seeing there's one a month, either with poor / none-existent skills, or ones that are ignored/locked (yes, theres currently topics ignored in the mapper applications).

IGNORED

Feel you man=))

[Spekter]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

[CarlJohnson]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

Its a joke, and if you didn't notice, last time when the red county bridge was broken a detour was built so players don't face much difficulty, also there are two more bridges which lead you out of red county.

I'd suggest observing before you come down to a conclusion.

[Spekter]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

Its a joke, and if you didn't notice, last time when the red county bridge was broken a detour was built so players don't face much difficulty, also there are two more bridges which lead you out of red county.

I'd suggest observing before you come down to a conclusion.

I did notice that makeshift wooden plank you refer to as a detour, but I didn't bother using it twice since it was awful. What about the Palomino Creek bridge? No detours there, just plain annoyance of having to drive to the second one. I'm sure I'm not the only one that'd be happy if mappers didn't mess with the bridges.


I'd suggest taking all facts into account before coming down to a conclusion regarding other people's conclusions.

[Doc.]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

Oh my God Palomino Creek road work was so annoying lol

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

Its a joke, and if you didn't notice, last time when the red county bridge was broken a detour was built so players don't face much difficulty, also there are two more bridges which lead you out of red county.

I'd suggest observing before you come down to a conclusion.

I did notice that makeshift wooden plank you refer to as a detour, but I didn't bother using it twice since it was awful. What about the Palomino Creek bridge? No detours there, just plain annoyance of having to drive to the second one. I'm sure I'm not the only one that'd be happy if mappers didn't mess with the bridges.


I'd suggest taking all facts into account before coming down to a conclusion regarding other people's conclusions.

[CarlJohnson]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

Its a joke, and if you didn't notice, last time when the red county bridge was broken a detour was built so players don't face much difficulty, also there are two more bridges which lead you out of red county.

I'd suggest observing before you come down to a conclusion.

I did notice that makeshift wooden plank you refer to as a detour, but I didn't bother using it twice since it was awful. What about the Palomino Creek bridge? No detours there, just plain annoyance of having to drive to the second one. I'm sure I'm not the only one that'd be happy if mappers didn't mess with the bridges.


I'd suggest taking all facts into account before coming down to a conclusion regarding other people's conclusions.

It's your opinion, pretty sure there were people who liked the roadwork. It's quite easy to criticize people when the do something uhm different

[Spekter]

otherwise should I blow up some another bridge to prove that I'm not inactive?

No, you definitely should not. While regular roadworks are an interesting change to the map when done correctly, destroying bridges is stupid and plain annoying. If making bridges unusable is the only change you can bring to the map as a mapper at a certain time, it's better that you leave everything as it is.

Its a joke, and if you didn't notice, last time when the red county bridge was broken a detour was built so players don't face much difficulty, also there are two more bridges which lead you out of red county.

I'd suggest observing before you come down to a conclusion.

I did notice that makeshift wooden plank you refer to as a detour, but I didn't bother using it twice since it was awful. What about the Palomino Creek bridge? No detours there, just plain annoyance of having to drive to the second one. I'm sure I'm not the only one that'd be happy if mappers didn't mess with the bridges.


I'd suggest taking all facts into account before coming down to a conclusion regarding other people's conclusions.

It's your opinion, pretty sure there were people who liked the roadwork. It's quite easy to criticize people when the do something uhm different

The fact that it's different doesn't neccessarily make it a good thing.

[Martin]

Enough is enough. Every person has it's own opinion, that doesn't mean you should go blazing on a topic, which's main point isn't that. End of story.