Warning Vs. Ban

[zacco]

Like i did say

ok so if i get you  right Tomas and nagy you both want to have a harder system for ramming, insulting and so on.

no warn only ban did i understand you correct .


but we going to take this with us and see what we can do to get harder on the warn or ban.

zacco

[ThomasKirkman]

Yes Zacco.  It is my opinion that if clear evidence is shown of someone intentionally ramming another player, first offense should be a one or three day ban, and get progressively longer if it continues.  BUT, I would like to hear other players put in their two cents on this also.

ThomasKirkman

[Konali]

I think warnings should be skipped for intentional ramming, also with players that collect them as awards. Because imo if you have 15+ warns in ur CT career u clearly show u dont give a fuck about the rules. So i think in most cases based on player history warns could be skipped.

Konali

[$nake]

I think warnings should be skipped for intentional ramming, also with players that collect them as awards. Because imo if you have 15+ warns in ur CT career u clearly show u dont give a fuck about the rules. So i think in most cases based on player history warns could be skipped.

Konali

thats why our cool admins are banning guys who have broken this same rule AGAIN AGAIN..
*cough* strato *cough* instead of warning them, when warns wont work at their minds positively..

[Nagy_Sanyi]

Because imo if you have 15+ warns in ur CT career u clearly show u dont give a fuck about the rules

Konali

*Cough* Anri *Cough*

[Axi.]

Because imo if you have 15+ warns in ur CT career u clearly show u dont give a fuck about the rules

Konali

*Cough* Anri *Cough*

LOL

[Master Hammy]

I think mick should establish a code of discipline that staff have to follow.

[Ethan]

I think mick should establish a code of discipline that staff have to follow.

each person sees everything different and would react differently so I dont think that would be nessacary