No, not /mute. Why should one be punished by responding to what someone has said to them? Sure it's immature, but most people do it. I think blocking chat between certain people is a little better, cause then they can't fight. When someone is muted, the argument normally continues in some way or another. If both people in the fight can't see what each other say, it's a little bit better to solve.
Plus many times when people are fighting or arguing, only one person gets muted. This is unfair because sometimes the other player will end up picking on the one that's muted. If you have a chat blocked from someone, it should end because they have nothing to fight about then.
I find it's just a better way to seperate than to /mute. I know many may disagree, but there are advantages and disadvantages to the command.
I feel it's best use would be when you just don't like someone, you can just block them.
Plus many times when people are fighting or arguing, only one person gets muted. This is unfair because sometimes the other player will end up picking on the one that's muted. If you have a chat blocked from someone, it should end because they have nothing to fight about then.
I find it's just a better way to seperate than to /mute. I know many may disagree, but there are advantages and disadvantages to the command.
I feel it's best use would be when you just don't like someone, you can just block them.