News:

Server address: server.convoytrucking.net
Get SA-MP 0.3.7 here: Click Here to download SA-MP 0.3.7

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 30 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the server name?:
What is 7 + 4?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Dobby
 - February 08, 2016, 15:41
Everything i said is just ideas right now. But sure, i've gone and removed the "active" part :)
Posted by TheGame
 - February 08, 2016, 12:33
Quote from: Emily on February 08, 2016, 12:21
Quote from: Ethan on February 08, 2016, 10:20
That all sounds good except for the "active" VIP part to change your house name. Why does have to be ",active"?? I kinda find that unfair.  My $0.02
I agree with Ethan here. If you're planning on making it an "active" VIP thing, then we might as well make every other VIP feature "active" only.
That means you have to pay a monthly fee for every VIP feature. That is like you have to pay a monthly fee for every step you make.. Which is kinda unfair. The former VIP players have contributed to the server in the past and they deserve it to get something back for it.
Posted by Emily
 - February 08, 2016, 12:21
Quote from: Ethan on February 08, 2016, 10:20
That all sounds good except for the "active" VIP part to change your house name. Why does have to be ",active"?? I kinda find that unfair.  My $0.02
I agree with Ethan here. If you're planning on making it an "active" VIP thing, then we might as well make every other VIP feature "active" only.
Posted by Ethan
 - February 08, 2016, 10:20
That all sounds good except for the "active" VIP part to change your house name. Why does have to be ",active"?? I kinda find that unfair.  My $0.02
Posted by Dobby
 - February 07, 2016, 21:53
I have this planned for a future update. It'll be based on "total slots". Basics of it will be;

  • You can't exceed or purchase a second house with slots exceeding your first "primary" house (/sethouse returns). IE: I own a 3 slot. I can't buy a 4 slot if that 3 slot is my primary. I can buy 3 slot or lower.
  • Each house (if eligible) will have maintenance rates. Basically to deter the people that return every X days. This will be basics like "rent" etc.
  • House evictions will be automatic (Joshy might need to assist with SQL in relation to this) and based on loads, average time etc. This will not be released to the public.
  • House features:
    - Labels (IE: Laur's Pimp Hut, or Laur's Slut Shop). This will require an active VIP status in game. If your VIP expires you cannot set another label on your property, or properties.
    - Garage interiors like GTA V (still thinking about this. So not 100% definite)




    Rank(s) and restrictions will apply. So when this update is done, a topic will be made in help/FAQ section explaining what it does/is etc.
Posted by Ethan
 - February 07, 2016, 21:36
http://www.convoytrucking.net/houses/forsale
everyone who is actively playing could get a second and even third house. there are so many.. My name is Ethan, and I approve this message and also support this suggestion.
Posted by Ari
 - February 07, 2016, 16:07
There are too many houses of 2 slots Like
Posted by Laur
 - February 07, 2016, 10:27
Quote from: Spekter on February 07, 2016, 02:46
There are many ways this could be nicely implemented and balanced out. This was already rejected in the past, but that was a time when there weren't enough houses for everyone that wanted them, and it was completely reasonable not to make it happen. Today, that has drastically changed and now there's over a thousand vacant houses that are most likely going to stay empty. I just think that the remaining players would appreciate it.
This.
If you think players will have no more houses to buy then you haven't been in San Fierro
Posted by Spekter
 - February 07, 2016, 02:46
There are many ways this could be nicely implemented and balanced out. This was already rejected in the past, but that was a time when there weren't enough houses for everyone that wanted them, and it was completely reasonable not to make it happen. Today, that has drastically changed and now there's over a thousand vacant houses that are most likely going to stay empty. I just think that the remaining players would appreciate it.
Posted by Mr.Me
 - February 07, 2016, 02:25
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 07, 2016, 01:49
Quote from: Mr.Me on February 07, 2016, 01:08
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.

thats not abuse lol
What so buying high slot houses for no reason so other players can't have them since they are limited isn't abuse......... top logic
there will be limit 100% that u can buy only 2-3 slot house but i dont see it as abuse if someone has money he can waste it on whatever he wants
or we can change on 2. house if u r 10days in row off u will lose house without refund u can only get money back if u sell it something like that :D
Posted by Spekter
 - February 07, 2016, 01:59
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 07, 2016, 01:49
Quote from: Mr.Me on February 07, 2016, 01:08
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.

thats not abuse lol
What so buying high slot houses for no reason so other players can't have them since they are limited isn't abuse......... top logic


Second house could easily be limited to a either 1, 2 or 3 slots, lots of them are available and demand for them is next to non existent. I don't think there'd be any abuse this way.
Posted by bazingashane0
 - February 07, 2016, 01:49
Quote from: Mr.Me on February 07, 2016, 01:08
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.

thats not abuse lol
What so buying high slot houses for no reason so other players can't have them since they are limited isn't abuse......... top logic
Posted by Mr.Me
 - February 07, 2016, 01:08
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.

thats not abuse lol
Posted by Mr.Me
 - February 07, 2016, 01:05
i dont see any reason posting suggestions when it will be rejected or will be on to-do-list but we didnt got any good update on server long time


anyway +1
Posted by Laur
 - February 07, 2016, 00:53
Quote from: bazingashane0 on February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.
The point is you cant benefit the double extra slots from Transport Tycoon rank, also you need to pay more for the house (lets say around 50% of its price), this way players can't really abuse it
Posted by bazingashane0
 - February 06, 2016, 23:18
The only reason I can see is players abusing it by buying another 4~8 slot when they already have a 6 + slot house.



Posted by Laur
 - February 06, 2016, 21:50
Quote from: TheGame on February 06, 2016, 20:44
Rejected many times. Will also happen to this one.

it's not like the old system at all, i made it so it will not be 100% be beneficial for players, it will give them half of house with around 50% more cost. I think it's ok
Posted by Shock
 - February 06, 2016, 21:16
Just no.
Posted by TheGame
 - February 06, 2016, 20:44
Rejected many times. Will also happen to this one.
Posted by Spekter
 - February 06, 2016, 20:15
This seems like a good idea to me due to the enormous surplus of houses we have at this moment. +1 from me. :ccmas: