Now, with the new ability "cut" from the original map, you should erase the objects/buildings that have no use. For example the 2 main railroad bridges. One connecting SF with TR and the other connecting LS with LV. You can use the space for something useful...or...not use it at all. More space = less lag, right?
yup, rails and their bridges are pointless, everything what is useless should be removed,
like he can remove one high SF tower to place there 20-flat block :)
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
Quote from: Ethan on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
I agree with you Ethan.
Quote from: Ethan on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
arent u bored of normal gta sa ? :) actually its possible to create sth new with these gta sa buildings :)
Quote from: Ethan on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
exactly, it would look sooo messed up
Quote from: Micks Elf on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
+1
first of all this would take fuck loads of time to do
Quote from: omer584 on December 04, 2011, 07:08
Quote from: Micks Elf on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
+1
+2
Quote from: DeSantaclaus on December 04, 2011, 10:16
Quote from: omer584 on December 04, 2011, 07:08
Quote from: Micks Elf on December 04, 2011, 01:12
so even though half of LS/LV/SF/desert is useless, you want to erase that too?? the general look of the game needs to stay, even if you cant drive on it or no trains exist.. you would want to get rid of all the trees too?
+1
+2
MASSIVE +3 really, no to this. Original map makes this game great. Adding a new one is a different story, but the original one MUST be left mostly untouched. Even the railways. Some players know this map as it is, with it's shortcuts and all.
No, people I was suggesting just buildings and bridges. Not terrain!!! That's just crazy...
Quote from: helion_prime on December 04, 2011, 13:35
No, people I was suggesting just buildings and bridges. Not terrain!!! That's just crazy...
Yeah, Agreed. Some of the default buildings in places could be better used as houses perhaps, or even some new load points.
hmm ... lets cut every bridge between those 3 cities xD
why not just delete everything you dont need for all the cities so all you have to do is drive 5 ft to your offload?
guys, not everything on the original SA map is going to be deleted that you think has no purpose to it. things like KACC gate and minor things that help open up the map are gone.. your not going to see 10000 things be deleted because it has no use on the server so please, stop suggesting things to be removed.
This wasn't a request, it was a suggestion. More gas stations, load points, or shops that don't require massive build work, would be good.
Lol guys, seriously? I am beginning to have second doubts about this samp feature.
San Andreas map was made really perfect. Some people know every single place on that map. Leave the map as it is. Some fences/barriers are ok to be removed but building? BRIDGES?? Seriously? And what is your problem with the railroads? It makes SA beautiful even if they are pointless, makes it complete. Please, don't alter the map in a major way. Why does this bother you guys?
And the lag problem, seriously... Get a new PC, lower the graphics, if you can't play cuz of lag, don't. For the rest, a bridge doesn't enterfeer with your roads, leave it.
yeah +1 :|
maybe the bridge removal was to far to be suggested. It still stands for small buildings that interfere for something useful.