Evicted time

[sorin]

60 days to evict a user from his house , it's alot.Why? Because , nowdays a lot of players with big houses they log in only for the house do 1-2 mission and then /q , they "quited" Convoy , because theyr acctivity is little.
So , i propose , the eviction time to be decrase at 30 days.
Please tell me your opinin , if this isn't a good opinion (please tell why).
[hide=a P.S]Sorry for my english , i hope you understood what i mean.[/hide]

[Shake]

It can be a good Suggestion, since you give them less time to login and they're more likely to lose their houses.
+1 from me.

[Bruno_2MLG4CT]

30 days, nah. Someone may go out of the country or study for exams or have no internet connection or a big thunder in his city which will stop the electricity or whatever. It's fine now.

[sorin]

30 days, nah. Someone may go out of the country or study for exams or have no internet connection or a big thunder in his city which will stop the electricity or whatever. It's fine now.

Who has exams the admins could make an topic for this. And the thunder doesn't stay in a city for 30days  , and the electricity will be repaired.

*In Zed's town is thunder and storms everyday    (It was an example , that you could apply to everyone)

[sardarji]

Big +1

30 days, nah. Someone may go out of the country or study for exams or have no internet connection or a big thunder in his city which will stop the electricity or whatever.

If this is the case why not make it to 40 days. 60 days is too much. One can easy come online in 60 days no matter how busy he is......

[Benny]

Should be like this:

40 days not being online 
and add this:
40 days of not doing a mission - you would get evicted to.

Or just add to the 60 days not being online add 60 days of not doing a mission - your house would get eviced by not being onlen 60 days or not doing any mission in the past 60 days.

[Goldy.]

it's a good idea +1

[Konali]

i agree but lets not complicate things and change something that has worked for 3 years now.
60 days may seem alot, but its acceptable.

[Hobo]

60 days is fine.

[Vinny]

Just turn those 60 days not logged in, to 60 days without mission, but don't announce it

[sardarji]

i agree but lets not complicate things and change something that has worked for 3 years now.
60 days may seem alot, but its acceptable.

Situation is different now. There is insufficient amout of houses as compared to ppls.....

Just turn those 60 days not logged in, to 60 days without mission, but don't announce it

Or maybe u must do 10 missions in 60 Days or amount of time online 20 hours online in 60 days....

[Vinny]

Yeah that too because im frenquently online but i dson't work a lot, just driving and chilling around so i think the time spent online should count

[Joshy]

There needs to be better ways to find and catch inactive players. The system right now is auto-evict after 60 days of inactivity but what about those who log in every 59 days? At the moment admins rely on the community to post in the topic "inactive players" in the report players board but they can't evict many because only a handful of people are actually reported (even though many people do it) and even when you get many people reported, you need to monitor them for at least 60 days and then have to decide if it's fair to evict them or not. Admins don't have anything but raw logs, a log searcher (by Mick) and a watchlist I made them many months ago.

Mick needs to script some sort of house hogging detection system, let's say if no missions have been done in the last 60 days and they still have a house, send a request to the watchlist to add them or add them to some sort of list. The LASTUPDATED field in the players table wouldn't cut this mainly because it seems to update whenever the player record is modified. There will need to be a new field like LASTMISSION which only gets updated when a player does a mission ^{or arrests a player etc}. And then make a script which tests if ( player.lastMission >= 60 days ago && player.hasHouse ) addToWatchlist();. People will surely learn about this and will do a mission every 59 days but if the mission threshold was decreased to let's say... 30 days the watchlist will watch them and it will be obvious if they logged in and did a mission just to keep their house.

This is what I mean by obvious by the way:

[TheSandman]

[hide=Joshys epic suggestion]
There needs to be better ways to find and catch inactive players. The system right now is auto-evict after 60 days of inactivity but what about those who log in every 59 days? At the moment admins rely on the community to post in the topic "inactive players" in the report players board but they can't evict many because only a handful of people are actually reported (even though many people do it) and even when you get many people reported, you need to monitor them for at least 60 days and then have to decide if it's fair to evict them or not. Admins don't have anything but raw logs, a log searcher (by Mick) and a watchlist I made them many months ago.

Mick needs to script some sort of house hogging detection system, let's say if no missions have been done in the last 60 days and they still have a house, send a request to the watchlist to add them or add them to some sort of list. The LASTUPDATED field in the players table wouldn't cut this mainly because it seems to update whenever the player record is modified. There will need to be a new field like LASTMISSION which only gets updated when a player does a mission ^{or arrests a player etc}. And then make a script which tests if ( player.lastMission >= 60 days ago && player.hasHouse ) addToWatchlist();. People will surely learn about this and will do a mission every 59 days but if the mission threshold was decreased to let's say... 30 days the watchlist will watch them and it will be obvious if they logged in and did a mission just to keep their house.

This is what I mean by obvious by the way:

[/hide]

But you would be able to add specific exceptions, like Mick for example.

[Benny]

[hide=Joshys epic suggestion]
There needs to be better ways to find and catch inactive players. The system right now is auto-evict after 60 days of inactivity but what about those who log in every 59 days? At the moment admins rely on the community to post in the topic "inactive players" in the report players board but they can't evict many because only a handful of people are actually reported (even though many people do it) and even when you get many people reported, you need to monitor them for at least 60 days and then have to decide if it's fair to evict them or not. Admins don't have anything but raw logs, a log searcher (by Mick) and a watchlist I made them many months ago.

Mick needs to script some sort of house hogging detection system, let's say if no missions have been done in the last 60 days and they still have a house, send a request to the watchlist to add them or add them to some sort of list. The LASTUPDATED field in the players table wouldn't cut this mainly because it seems to update whenever the player record is modified. There will need to be a new field like LASTMISSION which only gets updated when a player does a mission ^{or arrests a player etc}. And then make a script which tests if ( player.lastMission >= 60 days ago && player.hasHouse ) addToWatchlist();. People will surely learn about this and will do a mission every 59 days but if the mission threshold was decreased to let's say... 30 days the watchlist will watch them and it will be obvious if they logged in and did a mission just to keep their house.

This is what I mean by obvious by the way:

[/hide]

But you would be able to add specific exceptions, like Mick for example.

That would be the best solution of them all. Great idea Joshy.